A scientific wager is usually a wager whose outcome is settled by scientific process. They normally consist of an give to spend a specific sum of dollars on the scientific proof or disproof of some at present uncertain statement. Some wagers have precise date restrictions for collection, but quite a few are open. Wagers occasionally exert a highly effective galvanizing effect on society along with the scientific community.
Notable scientists that have made scientific wagers involve Stephen Hawking and Richard Feynman. Stanford Linear Accelerator has an open book containing about 35 bets in particle physics dating back to 1980; lots of are nonetheless unresolved.
Well-known scientific wagers
In 1959, Richard Feynman bet $1000 that no-one could construct a motor no bigger than 1/64 of an inch on a side. He lost the bet when Bill McLennan, utilizing amateur radio abilities, constructed such a motor. Feynman had never ever formalized the bet because he couldn’t define his terms sufficiently precisely, but paid up anyway; Feynman can also be on record as saying that he was disappointed with the outcome since he had hoped his reward would stimulate some new fabrication technologies, but McLellan’s motor made use of only current methods. Physicist Philip Ball, writing in Nature Materials, discusses this episode and concludes “Do we, like Feynman, usually underestimate what our present technologies can realize?”
In 1975, cosmologist Stephen Hawking bet fellow cosmologist Kip Thorne a subscription to Penthouse magazine for Thorne against four years of Private Eye for him that a Cygnus X-1 would turn out not to be a black hole. It was, so Hawking lost. It has been stated that Hawking hoped to lose the bet as so much of his own function depended upon the existence of black holes. For Hawking, then, the bet was a variety of insurance coverage.
In 1997 Stephen Hawking and Kip Thorne created a bet with John Preskill on the ultimate resolution in the apparent contradiction between Hawking radiation resulting in loss of info, as well as a requirement of quantum mechanics that info can’t be destroyed. Hawking and Thorne bet that data must be lost inside a black hole; Preskill bet that it need to not. The formal wager is: “When an initial pure quantum state undergoes gravitational collapse to kind a black hole, the final state in the finish of black hole evaporation will often be a pure quantum state”. The stake is an encyclopedia with the winner’s choice, from which “information could be recovered at will”. Hawking conceded the bet in 2004. See also: Thorne Hawking Preskill bet
In 1980, biologist Paul R. Ehrlich bet economist Julian Lincoln Simon that the price of a portfolio of $200 of each and every of 5 mineral commodities (copper, chromium, nickel, tin, and tungsten) would rise more than the following ten years. He lost: by 1990, the costs had fallen to $576. See also: Wager in between Julian Simon and Paul Ehrlich.
In 1870, Alfred Russel Wallace bet John Hampden, a believer inside the flat-Earth theory, that he (Wallace) could prove the flat Earth hypothesis incorrect. The sum staked was £500 (then worth a great deal more than now). A test, involving a stretch of your Old Bedford Canal, in London, was agreed on: Wallace measured the curvature of your canal’s surface utilizing two markers separated by about five kilometres and suspended at equal heights above the water’s surface. Utilizing a telescope mounted 5km from one particular in the markers, Wallace established that the nearer a single appeared to be the greater on the two. An independent referee agreed that this showed the Earth’s surface to curve away from the telescope, and so Wallace received his money. On the other hand, Hampden by no means accepted the result and created increasingly unpleasant threats to Wallace.
In 1684, Christopher Wren announced that he would give a book worth 40 shillings to everyone who could deduce Kepler’s laws in the inverse-square law. Isaac Newton’s musings on this trouble ultimately grew into his Principia. Nevertheless, Newton was as well late to qualify for the book. Historian Alan Shapiro has stated that this episode was “undoubtedly a single of the most critical wagers in scientific history”.
Licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses materials from the Wikipedia.